Cap’n Ken’s Homespun Wisdom

November 19, 2009

LSU / SEC Week 12 Picks

Filed under: College Football, LSU Football — Cap'n Ken @ 10:22 pm

What’s the difference between the 2008 LSU Tigers and the 2009 LSU Tigers? Georgia sucks this year.

Well, it’s not quite that simple, but after suffering through a very poor LSU patsy win last Saturday, this season is feeling a lot like 2008 – except that Georgia sucks. Last year, Georgia didn’t suck and LSU stood at 7-3 going into the final stretch against Ole Miss and Arkansas. And we suffered through a very poor LSU patsy win against Troy right before that.

But Georgia sucks, so LSU is 8-2 right now, not 7-3.

What’s really interesting is that ten games in, LSU isn’t much different defensively this year, giving up 311.8 yards per game compared to 311.1 yards per game ten games in to 2008. We’re 22 yards per game worse against the rush but 22 yards per game better against the pass. Minus the gifts of Jarrett Lee, however, LSU’s scoring defense is much improved at 13.7 points per game (compared to the pick six-aided 24.9 points per game of 2008).

Remember how the 2008 LSU defense was so horrible that Les Miles’ ridiculous “co-coordinator” experiment was ended and the high-profile John Chavis was brought in as the defensive savior? Kind of interesting that LSU’s defense hasn’t actually improved under Chavis this year but you don’t hear much grumbling.

I guess it’s hard to focus on the defense when your offense is this bad.

Last year at this time, LSU was averaging 394.2 yards per game. We are now averaging 310 per game, with rush yards down 44 and pass yards down 40 per game. Scoring has dropped off from 32.1 to 25 per game. And we’ve gone from allowing 1.2 sacks per game to allowing 2.7 sacks per game. And this, of course, with a “more experienced” quarterback, most of the skill guys back and the best offensive line Les Miles says he’s ever had.

Clearly there’s something wrong there. Some say Gary Crowton is over-complicating things; others say Jordan Jefferson just isn’t up to the task of leading an SEC offense. And others say the offensive line just lost too much this year (a theory I tend to agree with). But whatever the cause, it’s a glaring problem.

Which brings us to the No. 8 Tigers’ matchup with Ole Miss on Saturday. Last year, this game marked the beginning of the end for LSU’s season. The Tigers were still clinging to a No. 18 ranking with the prospect of finishing the season 9-3. It didn’t work out that way, of course.

Last year LSU managed a season-low 215 total yards against the Rebels and gave up 408 yards, which was behind only the totals given up to Florida (475) and Georgia (443) that season. And we lost, 31-13.

As I mentioned, LSU’s defense this year is about the same as it was last year; our offense is much worse. Ole Miss’ offense is about the same as last year (405 yards per game compared to 407 last year) as is their defense (313 yards allowed compared to 307 last year). The Rebels are coming off a 41-17 thrashing of a Tennessee defense that’s ranked right behind LSU, and they held the Vols to 112 fewer yards than their average production.

All of this, quite frankly, does not bode well. Even if LSU can contain McCluster and the Ole Miss offense, the Tigers will be throwing a gimpy offense (literally, with Jefferson, Dickson and Hebert semi-healthy at best and Scott out for the season) at a good Rebels defense that also happens to produce a lot of sacks (LSU gives up a lot of sacks even with a healthy quarterback and offensive line).

Ole Miss and LSU both have motivation in this game – the Tigers can finish in the top 10 with two wins to close out the year; the Rebels can reach nine wins by closing out strong. But I don’t see any advantage for LSU, especially on the road.

Rebels 31 – 9

Elsewhere in the SEC:

Kentucky at Georgia. A battle of two 6-4 teams (no, really), but these teams really aren’t comparable. Kentucky is a bad game by Auburn away from having one SEC win (over Vandy), and they’ve been generally pretty unimpressive. And while I say Georgia sucks, they are a much better team than Kentucky. Georgia needs this one bad. A win puts the Dawgs at 7-4 going in to a tough rivalry game against Georgia Tech; a loss leaves them scrambling for bowl eligibility – a term made for teams like Kentucky. I don’t see a ‘Cats win in Athens here.

Georgia 38 – 20

Mississippi State at Arkansas. The Bulldogs are staring at another 4-8 season if they don’t get past the Hogs. Arkansas still has a shot at 8-4. I don’t think MSU has the defense to slow down Mallett & Co. or the offense to fully exploit a weak Hogs defense.

Arkansas 45 – 31

Vanderbilt at Tennessee. Remember early in the season when LSU’s 23-9 win over Vandy was considered to be a great performance? Oh, right, the ‘Dores are 2-9 now and 0-7 in the conference. You have to figure Lane Kiffin and his daddy aren’t real happy with last week’s bad loss at Ole Miss. And Tennessee needs this one (and Kentucky next week) to reach 7-5 and claim bowl eligibility.

Vols 52 – 17

Patsies at No. 1 Florida and No. 2 Alabama.

Florida and Alabama

LSU / SEC Week 11 Recap

Filed under: College Football, LSU Football, Les Miles — Cap'n Ken @ 9:28 pm

I’ve not been in much of a hurry to recap LSU’s win over La. Tech because there’s really not a lot to say. Amazingly poor offensive performance – only 3-7 New Mexico State has put up fewer yards against Tech than the Tigers (Nicholls St. managed to put up 28 more yards than LSU) – and a defensive performance being sold as “good” despite giving up more yardage to Tech than Auburn, Navy, Nevada, Utah State and Boise State allowed.

It’s pretty telling that it’s considered progress that this game is being favorably compared to the Troy debacle in the same schedule slot last year. So enough said – this one sucked.

Elsewhere in the SEC:

Florida needed a huge pick six turn of events to salt away the Cocks. Meanwhile Alabama rolled with machine efficiency over Mississippi State. Big advantage to Alabama in the pre-SEC Championship Game perception shift.

I was pretty surprised (and more than a little concerned) with Ole Miss’ demolition of Tennessee. It seems that the Rebels have realized that Jevan Snead isn’t going to win the Heisman, but they have a fairly talented guy on the squad in Dexter McCluster. Sucks for LSU that Ole Miss has figured that out.

I also blew the Auburn / Georgia pick. Two picks by Chris Todd negated the offensive advantage the War Eagles had over Georgia, and the Dawgs shut down the Auburn run game (115 yards) like LSU did (112 yards).

Kentucky took care of Vandy; Arkansas didn’t have to come from way behind to beat Troy.

So ten games in (eleven for South Carolina, Vandy and Auburn), the SEC stands with two 10-0 teams, just a single two-loss (LSU) and three-loss (Ole Miss) team and nine teams with at least four losses. Yet only Vandy and Mississippi State have losing records. There’s a whole lot of mediocrity in the conference this year. But at least we’re not the ACC, where only Georgia Tech has fewer than three losses.

For the week: 5-2; for the season: 70-11.

November 12, 2009

LSU / SEC Week 11 Picks

Filed under: College Football, LSU Football — Cap'n Ken @ 10:42 pm

After its week in the spotlight, LSU takes a backseat to the real action in the SEC this week. There’s really not much that needs to be said about playing La. Tech, except that answers to the health of Jordan Jefferson and Charles Scott’s backups will be answered.

LSU 45 – 13

Elsewhere in the SEC:

No. 1 Florida at South Carolina. A few weeks ago this game looked like a potential stumbling block for Florida. The Cocks were 5-1 and showing signs of life. Then SC failed badly at Alabama, barely got past Vandy and got blown out in back-to-back games at Tennessee and Arkansas. Yes, anything can happen on the road in the SEC, but there’s no logical analysis that can be put here to predict a South Carolina win.

Gators 27 – 10

No. 2 Alabama at Mississippi State. As with Florida / USC, this game doesn’t favor a Bama loss in any way. The shining point for the Bulldogs is their rush offense, so good luck with that against Alabama. If the Tide falters, it would likely come from pressing the passing game to break out of that particular funk. And I wouldn’t be surprised to see Fonzie order a more aggressive attack early in this one, like he did last week against LSU. There would have to be a pretty spectacular failure by Bama to keep MSU in this one.

Bama 28 – 14

Tennessee at Ole Miss. A pretty big game for both the Vols and the Rebels. The winner of this one has a great shot at an 8-win season, which obviously would be a bigger deal to the rebuilding Vols than the under-achieving Rebels. Despite the arrest this week of Tennessee’s freshmen class, I think the Vols have more momentum, more to play for and maybe even more talent.

Tennessee 34 – 27

Auburn at Georgia. I don’t think the Dawgs have the offense to fully exploit the weak Auburn defense, and the War Eagles have the firepower to take advantage of a UGA defense that’s giving up an average of 30 points per game in SEC competition.

Auburn 41 – 31

Kentucky at Vanderbilt. Remember early in the season when LSU’s 23-9 win over Vandy was considered to be a great performance? Oh, right, the ‘Dores are 2-8 now and 0-6 in the conference. The numbers are fun on this one. Vandy is 41st nationally in rush offense, 111 in pass offense and 101 in rush defense. Kentucky is 22 in rush offense, 108 in pass offense and 102 in rush defense. Neither team may pass in this one.

Kentucky 16 – 9

Troy at Arkansas. Tempted to go with the big upset here, as Troy averages 315 yards of pass offense (against weak competition) and Arkansas is No. 116 in pass defense. But Troy is No. 106 in pass defense going against the No. 12 pass offense in the nation. Should Ryan Mallett have an epic meltdown, Troy could stay in this one. But it would be a little nuts to predict that.

Arkansas 56 – 48

Also, I failed to round up the rest of the SEC action last week. I was 7-1 for the week (missed Ark. / SC). For the season I’m now 65-9.

November 10, 2009

It’s official: Nike screwing with LSU uniforms

Filed under: Baton Rouge, College Football, Culture, LSU Football, Les Miles — Cap'n Ken @ 10:50 pm

Well, it looks like my beloved LSU Tigers are about to be caught up in the big-money marketing push of Nike and roll out “futuristic” uniforms for the Arkansas game Nov. 28.

—-
UPDATE 3: The LSU Nike uniforms in their full abominable glory.

UPDATE 2: More details on the uniform design from Nike.

UPDATE 1: LSU A.D. Joe Alleva confirms this oh-so-special event for LSU fans Nike that is a real special honor:

We will soon be unveiling an exciting one-game change to the LSU football uniform as part of Nike’s Rivalry uniform program that will be a tribute to LSU teams of the past. Our coaches and players are excited to be participating in this program that is being employed by a number of other major schools across the country because it offers a product with cutting-edge fabric and technology. The uniforms, which will debut on LSUsports.net on Sunday, November 22, will feature a unique design with a throwback element that Tiger fans will enjoy for our season finale against Arkansas. This is a one-time uniform adjustment to honor our past. We have no plans to make any permanent changes to the traditional LSU uniform.

Wow, cutting-edge fabric? Sign me up! To hell with all the LSU tradition Mr. Alleva has no doubt soaked up in the past 16 months. Can’t wait for the full view of the “unique design with a throwback element” (I’m guessing the different color of gold is the “throwback element”). Note that he makes it clear that LSU is only willing to sell out its traditions for Nike dollars for this one game. That’s second only to not actually selling out LSU’s traditions to Nike at all, I suppose. And I wonder how Mr. Alleva’s masters at Nike feel about him spilling the beans about LSU’s participation a week before Nike planned the big unveil.
—-

The very alert folks at Friends of The Program apparently dug deep into the web assets of Nike to uncover the yet-to-be-unveiled remaining participants in this Pro Combat marketing gimmick that I suppose pays football programs a butt-load of money to ditch their own uniforms for special – and generally really ugly – new “pro combat” Nike getups.

And LSU is on the list.

So far the only image floating around of the LSU Nike abomination is this:

Nike's LSU uniform abomination pro combat

Nike's LSU uniform abomination


I also did some digging in Nike’s source code and discovered that Nike will announce the LSU uniform on November 20 and unveil the actual hideousness November 23. That, I assume, is timed for the Tigers to wear this monstrosity against Arkansas in the season finale that weekend.

And Friends of The Program is correct – though it’s hard to believe – that the tagline for LSU’s jersey is “COCHON DE LAIT“. Yes, the suckling pig. To digress for a second, the other taglines Nike is using are “GOOD GUYS WEAR WHITE” for Virginia Tech, “DON’T BACK DOWN” for TCU, “EARNED” for Ohio State, “FEAR THE SPEAR” for Florida State, “STAKE OUR CLAIM” for Oklahoma, “FINISH THE MISSION” for Florida, “IT ONLY TAKES ELEVEN” for Texas, “BEAST MODE” for Missouri and “THE U KNOWS” for Miami.

LSU’s is “suckling pig”. Um, ok …

If you know one thing about me, it’s that I don’t want you to screw with LSU tradition. I don’t like that stupid Eye of the Tiger painted on the field, and I sure as hell don’t want Les Miles, Joe Alleva and Mike Martin selling out LSU’s uniform to Nike. Which is exactly what they are doing. Maybe the fact that none of those gentlemen have any significant history with LSU – Miles has not yet reached five years there; Alleva and Martin are under two each. Their combined tenure at LSU just barely totals more time than I spent in school there – doesn’t give them the appropriate reverence for things like LSU’s football uniforms.

I will be in Baton Rouge that weekend because our Thanksgiving rotation is set to have us in Louisiana the years LSU and Arkansas are playing at Tiger Stadium. My plans had been to go to the game. But I won’t go watch LSU in these uniforms. I don’t go to games to watch a Nike infomercial. I go to games to see LSU, and LSU looks like this:

Proper LSU uniform

LSU’s football program, athletic department and administration is choosing its association with Nike and the dollars being delivered over its fans. Their choice – fine. But I won’t be a participant in this. I’ll watch it on TV and spend my money that would have gone to the athletic department someplace else.

November 8, 2009

Controversy sells newspapers

Filed under: Baton Rouge, College Football, LSU Football, Media & Things — Cap'n Ken @ 10:16 am

Pretty amazing, even for their standards. The Advocate (the Baton Rouge daily, not the national gay newspaper) harps all over the interception denied Patrick Peterson in its post-game coverage of LSU / Alabama today but had not a word – literally, not a single word – about the other blown opportunity LSU had to get the ball back before Alabama scored its game-cinching field goal.

Bama punted, you see, with seven and a half minutes to go and the Tide up by six. The Tigers received the punt inside their 20 with plenty of time remaining and in a position to win with a touchdown. But Daniel Graff ran in to the kicker, giving Bama the ball back with a 4th and short situation. They converted that to keep the drive alive and set up the controversial Peterson interception/non-interception.

The Graff penalty wasn’t a controversial call – he clearly ran into the kicker’s leg and got the minimal five-yard penalty instead of a 15-yard, automatic first-down roughing call. And I guess that means it’s not worthy of a single word from The Advocate. But it was a huge turning point in the game – it took the ball out of LSU’s hands as surely as the Peterson ruling did. This, though, was LSU’s fault.

November 7, 2009

LSU / Alabama: The Judgment

Filed under: College Football, LSU Football — Cap'n Ken @ 10:05 pm

There will, no doubt, be a lot of griping by LSU fans about the blown call on Patrick Peterson’s 4th-quarter interception. And it’s pretty clear that was a bad call. But if that call would have marked the last best chance LSU had to win this game (and it would have), it’s important to focus on the larger context of how this game unfolded.

Working backwards … LSU killed itself by running in to the Alabama punter earlier in that drive … the inability to stop Mark Ingram (no easy task) put LSU in a bind … the cramps of Patrick Peterson led directly to Julio Jones’ touchdown … and the injury to Jordan Jefferson left LSU in the incapable hands of Mr. Jarrett Lee.

I felt good about the Tigers’ 7-3 halftime lead. It seemed at the time that LSU had enough contain on the Bama offense to make a game out of it. To be sure, the Tide was under-achieving. Alabama had just one drive of under 30 yards in the first half, but with poor field position on two drives, bad game management on another and an interception on the final drive of the half, they had managed just three points from 208 yards of offense.

LSU, on the other hand, had one very good 91-yard TD drive, a 33-yard drive that resulted in a punt and drives totaling 10, -5, 6 and 5 yards in the half. Seven points from 157 yards of offense.

Advantage LSU.

And then there was the second half. Bama went to Ingram and rang up 21 points on 250 yards of offense. The big hit, of course, was Julio Jones’ 73-yard TD catch/run when Patrick Peterson sat on the bench with cramps. In the second half, the Tide mounted drives of 81, 66, 73 and 32 yards (plus -1 on the safety possession).

LSU, meanwhile, managed just 123 yards of offense as Jefferson and Scott went down to injuries and put up just 6 more points in addition to the safety after halftime. Tiger drives totaled 28, 59, 9, -9 and 8 yards in the second half.

The Tigers got breaks in the first half to stay ahead of Bama and needed breaks in the second to stay with them. LSU got a huge break by downing a punt inside the Bama 1-yard line, but wasn’t able to capitalize enough on the safety and ensuing possession (which resulted in their final TD and 15-10 lead) to stay in front of the Tide.

More than anything, LSU needed a fourth-quarter counter to Mark Ingram. With Jarrett Lee at the helm and Charles Scott out of the game, it simply wasn’t there. Might not have been without the injuries either, but once Ingram got rolling things became really tough for LSU.

A 66-yard field-goal drive for Bama, a three-and-out for LSU, the Jones TD for Bama and a three-and-out for LSU. If not for running into the kicker, LSU would have gotten the ball back down six with 7:30 left to play. It’s hard to think Lee would have done much at that point, but it was LSU’s best shot to pull this one out.

The bad call on the Peterson interception one minute later cost LSU its final opportunity. But make no mistake – this game was won by Bama and Mark Ingram and lost by LSU, its lack of offense and injuries.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress