Cap’n Ken’s Homespun Wisdom

June 23, 2009

U-verse in Atlanta: An early review

Filed under: Atlanta, Capns World, East Atlanta, Media & Things, Tech & Whatnot — Cap'n Ken @ 10:40 pm

As of this morning, our household is fully up and running with AT&T’s U-verse TV and Internet service. This after having been an ardent supporter and customer of Dish Network for nine years.

I didn’t fall out of love with Dish. In a number of ways, U-verse TV is a step backward from what I had with Dish, and in some ways it’s an advancement. So my impressions of the TV service are going to be colored by a long history with advanced Dish Network equipment. And I’ll present the pros and cons from that perspective. But for somebody coming from Comcast or other cable providers, I have to think there are very few cons to U-verse.

My flirtation with U-verse started a couple of weeks ago when I received a promo kit in the mail announcing its availability in my neighborhood. The technology looked impressive, pricing was good, it was clear they were not out to screw you with equipment and installation charges – and they were offering a $200 rebate and $132 in TV/Internet discounts for signing up online.

But I was hesitant. I wanted to see the equipment in action before I made a decision. So off to an AT&T Store I went where a demo was promised. I checked out the semi-live demo and my interest remained (especially after confirming the 30-second skip function). Then a sales girl got me and said if I wanted to sign up they would really prefer I did it there. She took the $200 rebate to $225 (and ultimately $300), offered me an additional $80 credit on my wireless bill and showed me the secret to bringing down the cost of having a two-iPhone Family Talk plan since I was considering that as well.

Money, unfortunately, is a concern for us these days, so I couldn’t ignore the option of what seemed like a pretty good TV service and super-fast Internet that I would be given nearly $500 in cash, credits and discounts to sign up for (with no contract) and which that would cost me about $40 less per month from what we currently spend to get TV and Internet now. I went for it.

I won’t go through the details of the install headaches (expect some), so on to my initial impressions.

The setup:

The U-verse technology is all IP (Internet Protocol) based, so there’s a fat 25Mbps pipe coming into the house. That pipe carries video and Internet data. Right now I have the 18Mbps Internet service, but it could be that in real-world usage the video coming in consumes enough bandwidth that 18Mbps isn’t likely. I’ve been hitting speedtest.net a lot and see a lot of 13-14Mbps and have had as high as 17Mbps.

The system has a main gateway that is a router both for video signals and Internet (wired or wireless). There is a hard-drive DVR to record shows, and a networked box for our second TV on which live TV can be watched and programs from the DVR pulled. All of the wiring from the phone box outside is coax cable; with existing cables from Dish used.

The good:

- On-Demand. I’ll admit being jealous of cable subscribers when I was on Dish. Satellites don’t do on-demand well at all. U-verse has a deep supply of on-demand stuff, especially when you have the Showtime package like we do. I can’t even say yet what all is on there. Also includes NBC shows you can buy for a buck. Good response time loading shows and all that.

- DVR sharing. It’s a pretty seamless to pull up a show upstairs that lives on the DVR downstairs.

- Video quality. It’s at least on par with Dish Network.

- Online scheduling. A Yahoo-powered system with mobile versions; it’s done right. Doing it in a browser is preferable to doing in through the DVR (more on that later). I believe you have to be an AT&T Internet subscriber to do this, but if you have U-verse TV, you’d be stupid not to have their Internet.

- Non-HD recording capacity. Up to four non-HD channels can record at once. No concept of a “tuner” with IPTV.

- Value. Compared to Dish, where we had a pretty strong channel lineup, HD and the HBO package, we’re saving about $20 a month on programming with U-verse (not including the promotional discount). And here we have a really strong channel lineup, HD and the Showtime package. Having to pay $8.99 for locals on Dish is a real ripoff. And Dish’s equipment costs are higher, so for a very comparable setup we save about $32 a month.

The not-so-good:

- Dumb second box. It’s a pretty ridiculous notion that I can use my Mac’s browser or my iPhone’s browser to schedule and manage recordings, but I can’t use the non-DVR box itself. Everything in this system is “the Internet” – that DVR commands can go out of my Internet connection to some Yahoo server and then come back down my Internet connection to my DVR but they can’t simply go from Box B to Box A on the same network is stupid. Maybe the stupidest thing ever. And apparently you can’t pay extra and just get a second DVR on the system.

- Too-small hard drive. I don’t feel like looking up gigabytes, but my old Dish DVR did 55 hours of HD; this one does 33 hours. And I had two Dish DVRs. Seems like AT&T favored a small box over a high-capacity DVR. They should have come out of the gate with bigger capacity than Dish, not smaller.

- Poor timer / conflict management. On Dish, I could set up a series timer that basically says “get all new episodes”. Then you could manage priorities of timers to handle conflicts. And if a conflict caused one recording to be skipped, Dish would automatically get that episode if it came on again. With so many networks re-running shows for west-coast prime time and later in the week, the system worked great. Not with U-verse. If I tell the system to record new episodes of a show that airs at 8 p.m. Eastern and there’s a conflict, game over. The system doesn’t recognize that the same episode comes on again at 11 or anything like that. Very poor.

- No picture-in-picture. Somewhere in the bulk of marketing materials I read about U-verse, it talked about some kind of advanced 16-view PIP. We don’t have that here – or any PIP functionality.

- Jerky 30-second skip. You hit the jump and it sort of skips forward, showing you bits of what happened in those 30 seconds. That makes it hard to quickly skip past a block of commercials.

- Old-school remote. I don’t remember the last time I had to point my Dish remote at the receiver to control the box. But this is a line-of-sight remote. Again, you’re talking about new technology; put an IR remote on this thing.

- HD channel organization. Dish works its program guide so that an HD version of a channel appears right below the non-HD version. U-verse only shows HD channels in their own section. That makes it difficult to cruise channels and then decide if you want HD (to view) or maybe SD (to record).

That’s my impression after about 24 hours with the system. In short, the content is great; the pricing is good but the technology leaves a lot to be desired. And as a “high tech” system, that’s bad. My understanding is that most U-verse customers are cable-switchers, and the system seems designed to make somebody with Comcast think it’s awesome. It could be so much more.

If money didn’t matter as much as it does right now, I’d keep the super-fast U-verse Internet and stay with Dish until the U-verse TV technology improves. But I’m at a place where throwing about $500 in incentives at me and saving me $32 a month on TV going forward matters more than it used to. And all Dish would offer me to stay – after nine years as a customer – was a six-month discount and free movies for three months.

But I’m not taking down my Dish dish. I imagine U-verse will improve over time, but right now I think it’s just sub-par compared to Dish.

November 11, 2008

Sirius music channels win in XM merger

Filed under: Media & Things, Music & Whatnot, Tech & Whatnot, The TL — Tags: , , — Cap'n Ken @ 4:09 pm

Word is leaking out about what the XM lineup will look like in a post-merger world. Supposedly the switch is going to be flipped on this very soon. Loyal Wisdom readers will recall that I’m a Sirius fan from way back, have never been very impressed with the music of XM and didn’t hold out much hope that the far-superior music lineup of Sirius would survive the merger.

So I’m really happy to see that Sirius’ music lineup is apparently winning the battle for bandwidth over XM’s completely unforgettable roster of stations. Yep, Underground Garage is there, along with Outlaw Country, 1st Wave, Classic Rewind and Classic Vinyl. Looks like the B.B. King-branded XM blues station sticks around, which is probably OK. Can’t say I’ve listened much to XM blues before, so I’ll leave that judgment to somebody with better ears for it (TCL).

But, alas, I am soon to no longer be a Sirius subscriber. My annual subscription expires on the 14th and I’m not renewing. It’s not a reflection of my views on Sirius or satellite radio; it’s purely a fiscal decision being driven by us being a one-income household right now and the fact that not having a job means not being in the car much to listen to Sirius. But I am at home a lot, and by virtue of being a Dish Network customer, I get all the Sirius music through my TV anyway at no added cost.

I’m proud to have been an early adopter of satellite radio (Nov. 14, 2003), and it’s still a technology that’ll be high on my list when I get back into a mode where I can really take advantage of it. The new XM lineup will probably get me on as an “XM” subscriber instead of a “Sirius” subscriber now, though. They’ve got SEC football and my TL has an XM-equipped radio built in.

September 30, 2008

Google 2001 to Sarah Palin – who are you?

Filed under: Tech & Whatnot — Tags: , , , — Cap'n Ken @ 10:48 pm

This amuses me. Google’s throwback search engine they’re rolled out to celebrate their 10th birthday – Google 2001 – is a great way to see how the world was viewed a scant 7.5 years ago.

What I had to check out was the engine’s view on our current Presidential tickets.

“Barack Obama” tells the tale of a young Illinois state Senator and Harvard Law alum.

“John McCain” gives you information on his 2000 Presidential campaign and his Senate career.

“Joe Biden” is all about his Senate career.

“Sarah Palin” – Never heard of her.

September 16, 2008

SEC schedule iPhone app – now with 12 teams!

Filed under: College Football, Tech & Whatnot — Cap'n Ken @ 1:27 pm

Gearing up for the Auburn game this weekend, I wanted to make sure I had a good way to check scores on my iPhone. So I headed over to the iTunes store. Browsing around the Sports apps, I saw this awesome SEC Football Schedule app with a key update for version 2.0:


And only a buck! Sweet deal. Maybe version 3.0 will feature the removal of Auburn and Mississippi State as punishment for their 3-2 uglifest last week.

September 10, 2008

The odd existence of TigerGumbo.com

Three weeks ago, word came out that Scott Rabalais, the veteran LSU beat writer for The Advocate (The Baton Rouge daily, not the national gay newspaper) was leaving the paper to join an unknown outfit called TigerGumbo.com. At the time, tigergumbo.com was little more than a “coming soon” page. As the football season crept closer and then kicked off, TigerGumbo remained in “coming soon” mode with Rabalais stories just pasted in to the sole page the site seemed to have.

I’ve been checking in (I doubt anybody else is – the momentum of adding Rabalais was lost when the season started without a viable site up) to see when the site might actually “launch”, and apparently it has now.

I think it was better in “coming soon” mode.

The site is befuddling horrible. Just bad. Real bad. Broken links, empty sections, a registration system that apparently has no purpose (and no Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, etc.) and a hideous design with tons of obnoxious scrolling elements and certain pages that render as black text on an almost-black background (in Firefox, at least). Awesome.

If this was just another stupid site put up by some self-important jackass (like The Wisdom is), I could understand the horribleness. But apparently TigerGumbo is “An Official ESPN Affiliate” that somehow attracted the most recognizable LSU sports writer to work for it. How can it be in such poor shape with football season underway?

I thought it might be fun to figure out what TigerGumbo is all about.

When Rabalais was hired, there was a mention of “Impact Sports” as being behind the site. A little digging turned up a connection between TigerGumbo and similar sites for Alabama and Auburn. And those sites are built-out enough to link them back to a guy in Mississippi named Jamie Sablich. He apparently runs an empire consisting of casino supplies, beverage systems, a cabinet-making shop, a restaurant supply business and a couple of restaurants – including Burger Burger in Biloxi. He also seems to have some kind of technology consulting shop, but there’s no mention of online publishing, college sports or anything of the sort on his sites.

Sablich formed Impact Sports LSU, LLC on August 13 (the Alabama and Auburn LLCs were formed in May, which is also when the domains were created), so I think it’s likely that he launched TigerGumbo based on closing a deal with Rabalais to join up. And, sure, they’ve had little time to ramp up and would probably prefer nobody find them just yet.

But it’s curious that Sablich would land this “ESPN Affiliate” designation for high-profile programs like Alabama, Auburn and LSU on his newly-created sites. All three schools, of course, have really active online communities, so how the casino equipment king of coastal Mississippi ends up with that relationship is a real head-scratcher. None of these sites have approached anything close to critical mass, and ESPN – well, they’re the leader in sports or whatever.

What, exactly, it means to be “An Official ESPN Affiliate” is a bit of an open question as well. If it’s something akin to Yahoo’s Rivals.com, that hasn’t become apparent on ESPN.com yet. There are scattered references online to team-oriented sites and sport-specific sites “becoming an ESPN affiliate”, and there are references to geographic “affiliate” sales across media in ESPN sales propaganda, so maybe it’s just an ad-sales network at this point.

In any case, Sablich was able to secure these affiliate relationships based on something other than having created successful sites for these programs. That just seems odd in the online world where reputations are everything and site loyalty is strong. And for a guy like Rabalais to sign on to work for a then-nonexistent site owned by a guy who had been in the online sports publishing world for three months is also curious. My guess there is he was probably offered early retirement from The Advocate and doesn’t have much to lose here.

September 9, 2008

Google Suggest and the Presidential candidates

Filed under: Tech & Whatnot — Tags: , , , , — Cap'n Ken @ 8:40 pm

As an adjunct to something else I’m working up, there are some interesting dynamics that come up when you start looking at how Google Suggest views the Presidential candidates and their running mates.

Putting in the first names (presumably one would start a search for a candidate by putting in their name) of the four ticket holders reveals hit counts and – more interestingly – relative “ownership” of their first names in the web world.

Barack Obama, of course, is the clear owner of “Barack”:


It’s all Obama, all the time with his name. The Muslim stuff, his biography, “Barack Roll” … it’s all there. And 57.5 million results for “Barack Obama” is pretty strong.

It’s a different story altogether for “John” and John McCain:


Oof. “John” is, of course, a really common name, but McCain can’t finish better than third. And my own Congressman John Lewis gets top billing? I’m not sure what that’s all about. And, yes, we live in a world where people are more likely seeking out John Mayer than John Lennon. But the old man does have 40 million results, which isn’t bad.

On the VP end, “Joe” is owned nicely by Joe Biden:


Satriani can’t hang with Joe Biden, man! I think (but I’m not sure) it says good things about the world that Joe Rogan beats out Girls Gone Wild dude Joe Francis, and it’s satisfying to see Joe Strummer making the cut – but below Joe Walsh? Please. Biden’s result count of just 3.1 million, however, shows you why he’s not at the top of the ticket.

And, finally, we have “Sarah”. I have some bad news for Gov. Palin here:


Wow. Behind both soprano Sarah Brightman and super-sassy Sarah Silverman. At least she beats Buffy and that Canadian singer. And just 357,000 results? Ouch – less than “Barack Obama Antichrist”.

It should be noted, though, that the result counts in Google Suggest lags what Google shows on its results pages. “Sarah Palin” returns 16.1 million results when you actually run the search. She’s come a long way, baby.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress