Cap’n Ken’s Homespun Wisdom

November 8, 2009

Controversy sells newspapers

Filed under: Baton Rouge, College Football, LSU Football, Media & Things — Cap'n Ken @ 10:16 am

Pretty amazing, even for their standards. The Advocate (the Baton Rouge daily, not the national gay newspaper) harps all over the interception denied Patrick Peterson in its post-game coverage of LSU / Alabama today but had not a word – literally, not a single word – about the other blown opportunity LSU had to get the ball back before Alabama scored its game-cinching field goal.

Bama punted, you see, with seven and a half minutes to go and the Tide up by six. The Tigers received the punt inside their 20 with plenty of time remaining and in a position to win with a touchdown. But Daniel Graff ran in to the kicker, giving Bama the ball back with a 4th and short situation. They converted that to keep the drive alive and set up the controversial Peterson interception/non-interception.

The Graff penalty wasn’t a controversial call – he clearly ran into the kicker’s leg and got the minimal five-yard penalty instead of a 15-yard, automatic first-down roughing call. And I guess that means it’s not worthy of a single word from The Advocate. But it was a huge turning point in the game – it took the ball out of LSU’s hands as surely as the Peterson ruling did. This, though, was LSU’s fault.

October 25, 2009

My LSU beef this morning isn’t with the team

Filed under: Baton Rouge, College Football, LSU Football, Media & Things — Cap'n Ken @ 1:22 pm

Whether it’s homerism or incompetence, there’s a narrative being laid out by The Advocate (the Baton Rouge daily, not the national gay newspaper) about last night’s LSU / Auburn game that’s just frustratingly wrong. This isn’t a criticism of the Tigers, who I think played an excellent game last night. It’s a criticism of LSU’s hometown newspaper – the outfit that puts more resources toward covering LSU football than any other and should be doing a better job.

The narrative put forth by The Advocate is that the LSU defense shut down a great offense. As mentioned in their main game story:

- “Although not a flawless performance, the thorough dismantling at Tiger Stadium — especially of one of the SEC’s best offenses — should be the tinder for a new topic of debate in Baton Rouge and around the league.”

- “For the defense, Saturday was just the latest chapter in a nicely unfolding story of season-long improvement, bordering on championship domination.”

- “LSU limited Auburn’s high-octane offense to a season-low 193 yards and forced three turnovers.”

- “Auburn (5-3, 2-3) entered the game ranked second in the SEC in total offense, rushing offense and passing offense.”

These themes are repeated in a secondary column headlined Tough night for Auburn:

- “Malzahn filled in more of those blanks, taking more than a fair share of time to talk about an LSU defense that held the Southeastern Conference’s No. 2 scoring offense (34.9 points a game), the No. 2 rushing offense (247.3 yards per game) and the No. 2 team in total offense (464.9 ypg) to three points, 112 net rushing yards and 193 total yards.”

It’s a nice story and very complimentary of LSU’s defense. Unfortunately, it’s not reality. I can’t find a single reference in The Advocate’s post-game coverage to the recent history of Auburn’s offense, and specifically the spectacular flame-out of Dead Arm Chris Todd.

And it doesn’t take much to understand the real story here – Auburn’s offense started the season really strong but has completely unraveled as their passing game disappeared and the team became one-dimensional. Through the first four games of the season (La. Tech, Miss. State, W. Virginia and Ball State), Auburn was averaging 526 yards and 45 points a game. Very respectable given two non-patsies early on. But after a decent performance against Tennessee (459 yards, 26 points), something went very wrong. The War Eagles managed just 375 yards and 23 points against Arkansas (No. 105 nationally in total defense) and then just 315 yards and 14 points against Kentucky (No. 59 in total defense). In those games, Auburn passed for 133 and 95 yards, respectively.

For whatever reason, Auburn no longer has a “high-octane” offense and is clearly not “one of the SEC’s best offenses”. That LSU held them to just 193 yards and 10 points is great – it would be really concerning if they hadn’t – but it’s important to understand the context. And that context is promising. LSU recognized Auburn’s weaknesses, game-planned to take advantage of them and executed really well. That approach will come in handy against a vulnerable Alabama offense.

We should have accurate context from the Baton Rouge paper. Very good things came out of the Auburn game, but apparently The Advocate doesn’t understand what they are.

June 23, 2009

U-verse in Atlanta: An early review

Filed under: Atlanta, Capns World, East Atlanta, Media & Things, Tech & Whatnot — Cap'n Ken @ 10:40 pm

As of this morning, our household is fully up and running with AT&T’s U-verse TV and Internet service. This after having been an ardent supporter and customer of Dish Network for nine years.

I didn’t fall out of love with Dish. In a number of ways, U-verse TV is a step backward from what I had with Dish, and in some ways it’s an advancement. So my impressions of the TV service are going to be colored by a long history with advanced Dish Network equipment. And I’ll present the pros and cons from that perspective. But for somebody coming from Comcast or other cable providers, I have to think there are very few cons to U-verse.

My flirtation with U-verse started a couple of weeks ago when I received a promo kit in the mail announcing its availability in my neighborhood. The technology looked impressive, pricing was good, it was clear they were not out to screw you with equipment and installation charges – and they were offering a $200 rebate and $132 in TV/Internet discounts for signing up online.

But I was hesitant. I wanted to see the equipment in action before I made a decision. So off to an AT&T Store I went where a demo was promised. I checked out the semi-live demo and my interest remained (especially after confirming the 30-second skip function). Then a sales girl got me and said if I wanted to sign up they would really prefer I did it there. She took the $200 rebate to $225 (and ultimately $300), offered me an additional $80 credit on my wireless bill and showed me the secret to bringing down the cost of having a two-iPhone Family Talk plan since I was considering that as well.

Money, unfortunately, is a concern for us these days, so I couldn’t ignore the option of what seemed like a pretty good TV service and super-fast Internet that I would be given nearly $500 in cash, credits and discounts to sign up for (with no contract) and which that would cost me about $40 less per month from what we currently spend to get TV and Internet now. I went for it.

I won’t go through the details of the install headaches (expect some), so on to my initial impressions.

The setup:

The U-verse technology is all IP (Internet Protocol) based, so there’s a fat 25Mbps pipe coming into the house. That pipe carries video and Internet data. Right now I have the 18Mbps Internet service, but it could be that in real-world usage the video coming in consumes enough bandwidth that 18Mbps isn’t likely. I’ve been hitting speedtest.net a lot and see a lot of 13-14Mbps and have had as high as 17Mbps.

The system has a main gateway that is a router both for video signals and Internet (wired or wireless). There is a hard-drive DVR to record shows, and a networked box for our second TV on which live TV can be watched and programs from the DVR pulled. All of the wiring from the phone box outside is coax cable; with existing cables from Dish used.

The good:

- On-Demand. I’ll admit being jealous of cable subscribers when I was on Dish. Satellites don’t do on-demand well at all. U-verse has a deep supply of on-demand stuff, especially when you have the Showtime package like we do. I can’t even say yet what all is on there. Also includes NBC shows you can buy for a buck. Good response time loading shows and all that.

- DVR sharing. It’s a pretty seamless to pull up a show upstairs that lives on the DVR downstairs.

- Video quality. It’s at least on par with Dish Network.

- Online scheduling. A Yahoo-powered system with mobile versions; it’s done right. Doing it in a browser is preferable to doing in through the DVR (more on that later). I believe you have to be an AT&T Internet subscriber to do this, but if you have U-verse TV, you’d be stupid not to have their Internet.

- Non-HD recording capacity. Up to four non-HD channels can record at once. No concept of a “tuner” with IPTV.

- Value. Compared to Dish, where we had a pretty strong channel lineup, HD and the HBO package, we’re saving about $20 a month on programming with U-verse (not including the promotional discount). And here we have a really strong channel lineup, HD and the Showtime package. Having to pay $8.99 for locals on Dish is a real ripoff. And Dish’s equipment costs are higher, so for a very comparable setup we save about $32 a month.

The not-so-good:

- Dumb second box. It’s a pretty ridiculous notion that I can use my Mac’s browser or my iPhone’s browser to schedule and manage recordings, but I can’t use the non-DVR box itself. Everything in this system is “the Internet” – that DVR commands can go out of my Internet connection to some Yahoo server and then come back down my Internet connection to my DVR but they can’t simply go from Box B to Box A on the same network is stupid. Maybe the stupidest thing ever. And apparently you can’t pay extra and just get a second DVR on the system.

- Too-small hard drive. I don’t feel like looking up gigabytes, but my old Dish DVR did 55 hours of HD; this one does 33 hours. And I had two Dish DVRs. Seems like AT&T favored a small box over a high-capacity DVR. They should have come out of the gate with bigger capacity than Dish, not smaller.

- Poor timer / conflict management. On Dish, I could set up a series timer that basically says “get all new episodes”. Then you could manage priorities of timers to handle conflicts. And if a conflict caused one recording to be skipped, Dish would automatically get that episode if it came on again. With so many networks re-running shows for west-coast prime time and later in the week, the system worked great. Not with U-verse. If I tell the system to record new episodes of a show that airs at 8 p.m. Eastern and there’s a conflict, game over. The system doesn’t recognize that the same episode comes on again at 11 or anything like that. Very poor.

- No picture-in-picture. Somewhere in the bulk of marketing materials I read about U-verse, it talked about some kind of advanced 16-view PIP. We don’t have that here – or any PIP functionality.

- Jerky 30-second skip. You hit the jump and it sort of skips forward, showing you bits of what happened in those 30 seconds. That makes it hard to quickly skip past a block of commercials.

- Old-school remote. I don’t remember the last time I had to point my Dish remote at the receiver to control the box. But this is a line-of-sight remote. Again, you’re talking about new technology; put an IR remote on this thing.

- HD channel organization. Dish works its program guide so that an HD version of a channel appears right below the non-HD version. U-verse only shows HD channels in their own section. That makes it difficult to cruise channels and then decide if you want HD (to view) or maybe SD (to record).

That’s my impression after about 24 hours with the system. In short, the content is great; the pricing is good but the technology leaves a lot to be desired. And as a “high tech” system, that’s bad. My understanding is that most U-verse customers are cable-switchers, and the system seems designed to make somebody with Comcast think it’s awesome. It could be so much more.

If money didn’t matter as much as it does right now, I’d keep the super-fast U-verse Internet and stay with Dish until the U-verse TV technology improves. But I’m at a place where throwing about $500 in incentives at me and saving me $32 a month on TV going forward matters more than it used to. And all Dish would offer me to stay – after nine years as a customer – was a six-month discount and free movies for three months.

But I’m not taking down my Dish dish. I imagine U-verse will improve over time, but right now I think it’s just sub-par compared to Dish.

November 11, 2008

Sirius music channels win in XM merger

Filed under: Media & Things, Music & Whatnot, Tech & Whatnot, The TL — Tags: , , — Cap'n Ken @ 4:09 pm

Word is leaking out about what the XM lineup will look like in a post-merger world. Supposedly the switch is going to be flipped on this very soon. Loyal Wisdom readers will recall that I’m a Sirius fan from way back, have never been very impressed with the music of XM and didn’t hold out much hope that the far-superior music lineup of Sirius would survive the merger.

So I’m really happy to see that Sirius’ music lineup is apparently winning the battle for bandwidth over XM’s completely unforgettable roster of stations. Yep, Underground Garage is there, along with Outlaw Country, 1st Wave, Classic Rewind and Classic Vinyl. Looks like the B.B. King-branded XM blues station sticks around, which is probably OK. Can’t say I’ve listened much to XM blues before, so I’ll leave that judgment to somebody with better ears for it (TCL).

But, alas, I am soon to no longer be a Sirius subscriber. My annual subscription expires on the 14th and I’m not renewing. It’s not a reflection of my views on Sirius or satellite radio; it’s purely a fiscal decision being driven by us being a one-income household right now and the fact that not having a job means not being in the car much to listen to Sirius. But I am at home a lot, and by virtue of being a Dish Network customer, I get all the Sirius music through my TV anyway at no added cost.

I’m proud to have been an early adopter of satellite radio (Nov. 14, 2003), and it’s still a technology that’ll be high on my list when I get back into a mode where I can really take advantage of it. The new XM lineup will probably get me on as an “XM” subscriber instead of a “Sirius” subscriber now, though. They’ve got SEC football and my TL has an XM-equipped radio built in.

November 4, 2008

Why does CNN shrink my TV by 50% on Election Day?

Filed under: Media & Things — Cap'n Ken @ 1:23 pm

For all that CNN has done well this campaign season (and they’ve done a lot well), it’s insanely annoying that they jam the screen up with all sorts of things that aren’t why I am watching and actually shrink the size of “CNN” itself by 50%.


They’ve got this marginally useful area to the right showing when polls close and what the weather is in different states, a whole extra banner of mostly useless trivia taking up space at the bottom, pure dead space above the TV image – and on CNNHD they just fill the extra space on the sides with wallpaper.

So on my 44″ television, I get a 22″ picture of CNN. There’s a reason I didn’t buy a 22″ television, guys.

I actually like your programming, so why do you shrink it by 50%?

September 29, 2008

Great moments in exaggeration

Filed under: College Football, LSU Football, Media & Things — Tags: , — Cap'n Ken @ 8:09 pm

I try my best not to visit tigergumbo.com (the hideous web design offends my sensibilities), but I do subscribe to the site’s feeds (which also sucks, because stories are repeated over and over in the feed) because Scott Rabalais does remain a good source of LSU info.

And I clicked over this evening to read Rabalais’ piece on CBS scheduling the LSU / Florida game as a prime-time broadcast. No great revelations, but I noticed a link at the bottom to the TigerGumbo Forum – I had to take a look.

As one might expect, the message board section of the brand-new LSU site that nobody knows about (outside of the casino and beverage industries in Mississippi, of course) is a pretty barren place right now. Yet that didn’t stop them from describing their LSU Football Forum thusly:


In case the funny is not apparent, they are describing a message board that has never been posted in as “The popular forum dedicated to LSU Football AND recruiting with LSU Tiger Football fans from around the world participating 24/7″

Yeah, just a little bit of wishful thinking there. That’s not so say someday TigerGumbo might not dominate LSU message boards (but it’s doubtful), but come on.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress