Cap’n Ken’s Homespun Wisdom

June 23, 2009

U-verse in Atlanta: An early review

Filed under: Atlanta, Capns World, East Atlanta, Media & Things, Tech & Whatnot — Cap'n Ken @ 10:40 pm

As of this morning, our household is fully up and running with AT&T’s U-verse TV and Internet service. This after having been an ardent supporter and customer of Dish Network for nine years.

I didn’t fall out of love with Dish. In a number of ways, U-verse TV is a step backward from what I had with Dish, and in some ways it’s an advancement. So my impressions of the TV service are going to be colored by a long history with advanced Dish Network equipment. And I’ll present the pros and cons from that perspective. But for somebody coming from Comcast or other cable providers, I have to think there are very few cons to U-verse.

My flirtation with U-verse started a couple of weeks ago when I received a promo kit in the mail announcing its availability in my neighborhood. The technology looked impressive, pricing was good, it was clear they were not out to screw you with equipment and installation charges – and they were offering a $200 rebate and $132 in TV/Internet discounts for signing up online.

But I was hesitant. I wanted to see the equipment in action before I made a decision. So off to an AT&T Store I went where a demo was promised. I checked out the semi-live demo and my interest remained (especially after confirming the 30-second skip function). Then a sales girl got me and said if I wanted to sign up they would really prefer I did it there. She took the $200 rebate to $225 (and ultimately $300), offered me an additional $80 credit on my wireless bill and showed me the secret to bringing down the cost of having a two-iPhone Family Talk plan since I was considering that as well.

Money, unfortunately, is a concern for us these days, so I couldn’t ignore the option of what seemed like a pretty good TV service and super-fast Internet that I would be given nearly $500 in cash, credits and discounts to sign up for (with no contract) and which that would cost me about $40 less per month from what we currently spend to get TV and Internet now. I went for it.

I won’t go through the details of the install headaches (expect some), so on to my initial impressions.

The setup:

The U-verse technology is all IP (Internet Protocol) based, so there’s a fat 25Mbps pipe coming into the house. That pipe carries video and Internet data. Right now I have the 18Mbps Internet service, but it could be that in real-world usage the video coming in consumes enough bandwidth that 18Mbps isn’t likely. I’ve been hitting speedtest.net a lot and see a lot of 13-14Mbps and have had as high as 17Mbps.

The system has a main gateway that is a router both for video signals and Internet (wired or wireless). There is a hard-drive DVR to record shows, and a networked box for our second TV on which live TV can be watched and programs from the DVR pulled. All of the wiring from the phone box outside is coax cable; with existing cables from Dish used.

The good:

- On-Demand. I’ll admit being jealous of cable subscribers when I was on Dish. Satellites don’t do on-demand well at all. U-verse has a deep supply of on-demand stuff, especially when you have the Showtime package like we do. I can’t even say yet what all is on there. Also includes NBC shows you can buy for a buck. Good response time loading shows and all that.

- DVR sharing. It’s a pretty seamless to pull up a show upstairs that lives on the DVR downstairs.

- Video quality. It’s at least on par with Dish Network.

- Online scheduling. A Yahoo-powered system with mobile versions; it’s done right. Doing it in a browser is preferable to doing in through the DVR (more on that later). I believe you have to be an AT&T Internet subscriber to do this, but if you have U-verse TV, you’d be stupid not to have their Internet.

- Non-HD recording capacity. Up to four non-HD channels can record at once. No concept of a “tuner” with IPTV.

- Value. Compared to Dish, where we had a pretty strong channel lineup, HD and the HBO package, we’re saving about $20 a month on programming with U-verse (not including the promotional discount). And here we have a really strong channel lineup, HD and the Showtime package. Having to pay $8.99 for locals on Dish is a real ripoff. And Dish’s equipment costs are higher, so for a very comparable setup we save about $32 a month.

The not-so-good:

- Dumb second box. It’s a pretty ridiculous notion that I can use my Mac’s browser or my iPhone’s browser to schedule and manage recordings, but I can’t use the non-DVR box itself. Everything in this system is “the Internet” – that DVR commands can go out of my Internet connection to some Yahoo server and then come back down my Internet connection to my DVR but they can’t simply go from Box B to Box A on the same network is stupid. Maybe the stupidest thing ever. And apparently you can’t pay extra and just get a second DVR on the system.

- Too-small hard drive. I don’t feel like looking up gigabytes, but my old Dish DVR did 55 hours of HD; this one does 33 hours. And I had two Dish DVRs. Seems like AT&T favored a small box over a high-capacity DVR. They should have come out of the gate with bigger capacity than Dish, not smaller.

- Poor timer / conflict management. On Dish, I could set up a series timer that basically says “get all new episodes”. Then you could manage priorities of timers to handle conflicts. And if a conflict caused one recording to be skipped, Dish would automatically get that episode if it came on again. With so many networks re-running shows for west-coast prime time and later in the week, the system worked great. Not with U-verse. If I tell the system to record new episodes of a show that airs at 8 p.m. Eastern and there’s a conflict, game over. The system doesn’t recognize that the same episode comes on again at 11 or anything like that. Very poor.

- No picture-in-picture. Somewhere in the bulk of marketing materials I read about U-verse, it talked about some kind of advanced 16-view PIP. We don’t have that here – or any PIP functionality.

- Jerky 30-second skip. You hit the jump and it sort of skips forward, showing you bits of what happened in those 30 seconds. That makes it hard to quickly skip past a block of commercials.

- Old-school remote. I don’t remember the last time I had to point my Dish remote at the receiver to control the box. But this is a line-of-sight remote. Again, you’re talking about new technology; put an IR remote on this thing.

- HD channel organization. Dish works its program guide so that an HD version of a channel appears right below the non-HD version. U-verse only shows HD channels in their own section. That makes it difficult to cruise channels and then decide if you want HD (to view) or maybe SD (to record).

That’s my impression after about 24 hours with the system. In short, the content is great; the pricing is good but the technology leaves a lot to be desired. And as a “high tech” system, that’s bad. My understanding is that most U-verse customers are cable-switchers, and the system seems designed to make somebody with Comcast think it’s awesome. It could be so much more.

If money didn’t matter as much as it does right now, I’d keep the super-fast U-verse Internet and stay with Dish until the U-verse TV technology improves. But I’m at a place where throwing about $500 in incentives at me and saving me $32 a month on TV going forward matters more than it used to. And all Dish would offer me to stay – after nine years as a customer – was a six-month discount and free movies for three months.

But I’m not taking down my Dish dish. I imagine U-verse will improve over time, but right now I think it’s just sub-par compared to Dish.

June 16, 2009

The LSU Dugout Ducker

Filed under: Baton Rouge, Capns World, LSU Baseball — Cap'n Ken @ 3:27 pm

Odd moment last night in the College World Series game between LSU and Arkansas. Blake Dean makes an out and heads to the dugout. ESPN cameras follow and capture a young lady at the end of the dugout who would really rather not be seen there:

So who is she … and why is she hiding?

Dugout Ducker

February 19, 2009

Has The Wisdom been abandoned?

Filed under: Capns World — Cap'n Ken @ 5:30 pm

Pretty much, at least for now. Reality today is that my brilliant thoughts on things in general end up at my original “other” site – EAVBuzz, where there’s real-time back and forth on topics started by me or whoever wants to stir things up.

And I’m too busy during the day and too tired at night (watching a kid is hard work) to ever make it down to the “write some Wisdom” part of my perpetual task list. I have to scramble to generate income in my “spare time”, and I simply lack the time or passion to contribute things here.

So I pretty much see the Wisdom as an LSU football blog going forward for now. That’s what I have enough passion for to think hard about and craft things to post here. And even there I owe attention – to the recruiting class and Leslie’s off-season moves (in a few words – I think he’s learned from last season and deserves a pass for the disaster that was LSU 2008).

For anybody stumbling across this, however, I will toss a bone. Check out Muggn, my new baby. That’s consuming my passion and “spare time” these days – and already is well out-performing the Wisdom’s audience in the heyday.

August 15, 2008

Dish Network lied to me; executive customer service guy is a douche

Filed under: Capns World, Tech & Whatnot — Tags: , , — Cap'n Ken @ 1:07 pm

Update: I had also sent an email in to a bunch of corporate email addresses at Dish, and today (Aug. 18) somebody got back to me with an apology for my customer service experience and promise to make the appropriate “adjustment” to my account. Hopefully this is a long-term change in what they are charging me.

As I mentioned about six weeks ago, Dish Network killed off my 942 HD-DVR and other older models either as part of their TiVo mess or just as policy during their big HD expansion. Whatever the reason, Dish called me up, told me that my 942 wouldn’t work come August 1 and offered to send me a new 622 HD-DVR on a no-cost lease (the post I linked to above says just that). I specifically asked about being charged for leasing a unit after I had already purchased the 942 they were killing, and I was specifically told by the Dish person that I would not have to pay the lease fee on the new DVR because I owned my 942.

Pretty darn clear – they called and said I would no longer be able to use my 942 and they needed to set me up with a 622. And because I own my 942, I would not be charged a lease fee for the 622. Crystal clear, no confusion, no doubt.

Ha. Right.

Checking the activity on my Visa this morning, I noticed my Dish Network auto-pay charge, and it was way more than my normal monthly bill. I knew this season’s ESPN GamePlan charges would be kicking in this month, but this seemed above even that. So I logged in to my account and checked out the most recent bill. Problems abounded.

- The “DISH Network DVR Service Fee” was $17.94 for August, and there was a pro-rated $5.20 fee for July as well.

- An “Addl Receiver Access Fee” of $5.00 had appeared in August, along with a $4.35 pro-rated fee for July.

- A “Leased Receiver Fee” of $7.00 had appeared in August, along with a $6.09 pro-rated fee for July.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Poking around the Dish site, I saw that they think I have three active receivers – the 622, the new 722 (which they brought instead of the 622 they said), and my old 942. Awesome that they didn’t actually deactivate the 942 like my 722 installer asked them to. So that explains the too-high DVR fee and the additional receiver fee – Dish thought I had three DVRs, not two. A call to customer service (India) quickly resolved that issue. They deactivated the 942 and put in reversals for the charges associated with it.

But then I asked about the leased equipment fee. The Dish policy is this: the first receiver you lease is no charge. Each unit after that is charged a monthly lease fee. For an HD-DVR, that’s $7 a month. I explained to the nice Indian lady that Dish had called me last month to tell me that the equipment I purchased would no longer work on their network, but that they were happy to send me a new HD-DVR at no cost and with no monthly lease fee – because it was replacing equipment I purchased. I specifically asked about this at the time because I wasn’t very happy at the prospect of incurring a lease fee when I was being forced to get rid of purchased equipment. So I am very, very, very sure the Dish woman who called me told me I would not incur an equipment lease charge because of this change from my 942 to their 622.

The Indian lady could offer nothing but explanations about their policy on lease fees for multiple receivers. I asked to speak to someone with more authority than her, and was given to a nice Indian man, who told me the same thing.

Very little satisfaction on this issue came from my Indian conversations. They said nothing other than “this is the policy” and offered a temporary courtesy waiver, so just for giggles I asked if there was anybody in America I could speak to. Somewhat to my surprise, Mr. Indian transferred me over to “executive customer service”. And that’s where I encountered one Mark Rodriguez.

Mr. Rodriguez also offered little relief – just the same 6-month waiver “as a courtesy” – and just kept insisting this was a “valid charge”. Valid, I guess, because Dish Network doesn’t have a problem with its agents lying to customers.

And that’s what bothers me so much – that their agent would call me up, tell me I could no longer use the equipment I purchased, and flat-out lie to me about the fact that the company will charge me $84 a year for the use of this new receiver I didn’t ask for.

Mr. Rodriguez, however, is a real piece of work. I mentioned at one point that if the person who had called me hadn’t lied about the no-cost equipment lease, I would have considered canceling my service rather than being hit with that charge. At that point he jumped in with “I can help you out with that request if you like.” A total douchebag – working in their “executive” customer service, no less.

When I finally got sick of him, I asked for the name of his supervisor so I could file a complaint about him. I’d resigned myself to the idea that six months without the fee is the best I could hope for after being lied to, so I wasn’t looking to continue that discussion – I just wanted to complain about the douchebag I had to deal with.

His response was that his supervisor is “Melissa”. I asked for a last name and he said he does not have to tell me her last name. I asked him for her phone number, and he said he does not have to provide that, either. So I asked him for the main number of his office and he says it’s the number he gave me at the start of the call as his contact number. Asked if that wasn’t his direct line, he said it was – and that he didn’t have to give me the main switchboard number.

Boy do I feel special. I then ask if I can speak to “Melissa”, and he says she is not available. I asked if he can transfer me to her line anyway so I can leave a message, and he said yes. And he transferred me … to the number one would call in to fetch voice mail messages. An immediate call back to Mr. Rodriguez got no answer, went to a voice mail box identified as being his, but one which is full and I could not leave a message in.

That, friends, is awesome customer service. You can, by the way, try to reach Mark Rodriguez yourself if you’re having a problem with your Dish service. I can’t promise he’ll answer or you can leave a message, but he’s at 915-298-5706.

And my takeaway from this experience? I doubt I’ll leave Dish over it (I’ve been a customer of theirs for eight years now … not that they seem to care about that) because I hate Comcast and like the Dish DVRs quite a bit. Though I do hear AT&T is expanding their video service … But it greatly lowered my opinion of Dish and pushes me away from the “satisfied customer” column. Oh, and I switched back to paper billing so I can see what charges they might try to slip by me now. That’ll eat in to the profit they’ll be making on my leased equipment fee, I suppose.

June 22, 2008

On the sidelines

Filed under: Atlanta, Capns World, Tech & Whatnot — Cap'n Ken @ 8:49 pm

Going out to my car the other day, I noticed this coffee mug hanging out on the garage floor. It had fallen off the shelf where I put empty Coke Zero cans and travel mugs when I have fresh beverages to take with me somewhere.

Google Mug

Yep, there it is. One of the more practical bits of corporate schwag I received from Google during the three years I worked with them as the search guy for EarthLink – lying there collecting dust. And I gotta say, that’s how I’ve been feeling about my “career” of late.

I was happy to get laid off last fall – as strange as it sounds, having it happen about a month after my first child was born was great timing. Severance came in handy and things are shaky enough at my former company that I would have been nervous having the wife quit her job to stay at home with the baby.

After the layoff, our plan became for me to stay home with the kid until my wife was done with some major projects at work. Then we would switch roles and I would go back to work. My window to go back opened about June 1, so I’ve been actively looking around for not quite two months now. I don’t like what I’m finding.

As my buddy Dave and I were discussing the other day, it’s not that there aren’t jobs available in Atlanta – just not interesting ones. Actually, I imagine there are some interesting jobs out there, but I’m not in a position to find them right now. I can manage to do interviews during the day, but networking and the like is really difficult to do with a 10-month-old tagging along.

In the best of times, Atlanta isn’t a bad market for interesting new media things. In not-so-great times, it’s not so great. The best leads and casual but serious offers from former colleagues have all come from the west coast. But as much as I enjoyed spending time in L.A. and the Valley at my old job, moving there just isn’t going to happen now. It was highly unlikely before I had a child – and just isn’t going to happen now. As I told one recruiter from the Valley; I like being married, and my wife and kid wouldn’t come with me to California even if I wanted to move.

Something will come along, I’m sure. But it’s different now that I’m actively looking – I’ve started to feel like that coffee mug collecting dust. I thrive on the challenge of new things. I get that with my little sideline bits like EAV Buzz, but in the best weeks I might get 20 hours to devote to the “professional” projects I do for fun and to stay sharp. And I ramble on about Yahoo and things to just keep my product brain healthy.

Keeping perspective is the hardest thing – what I’ve done is best for my daughter and it shows in her development. She is the “product” I’m “managing” right now, and we’ve had a successful launch. Maybe if I put together a PowerPoint showing her progress I’ve feel more “in the game”.

April 21, 2008

Sweet – my Dish DVR is illegal!

Filed under: Capns World, Tech & Whatnot — Cap'n Ken @ 6:44 pm

Well, just the 942 I have upstairs and the 721 I have stuffed away in a closet somewhere – and it doesn’t apply to me since I already bought them. But the fallout of the TiVo patent case apparently is that Dish can’t sell those machines anymore.

Of course, they’re not actually selling them anymore, so it’s more of a moral victory there for TiVo, I guess.

The notice Dish put out talks about “updated software” that newer boxes like my 622 have received that allow them to escape this injunction, but I haven’t seen anything that details why that is. From what I understand, the court ruled that TiVo’s “multi-media time-warping system” patent was valid and enforceable, and that Dish’s DVRs violated that patent. Dish refers to “next-generation” software that has been installed that does not infringe the patent, but my 942 sure does work a whole lot like my “next-generation” 622.

If I had to guess – and as a starting point for any IP lawyers who might be hanging around and want to offer an opinion – I’d say it’s because the TiVo patent is tied to “MPEG” encoding and Dish escapes that because their “next generation” boxes use MPEG-2 encoding. I know that the difference between my 942 and my 622 is MPEG-1 vs. MPEG-2 and that the 942 cannot be upgraded to receive MPEG-2, so that’s the basis of my hypothesis here. I don’t think MPEG-2 existed (or at least wasn’t in wide circulation) at the time of TiVo’s patent, so perhaps the court interpreted the reference to MPEG to mean MPEG-1, since that was the standard at the time. Thus, perhaps, TiVo’s patent was not worded well to cover future MPEG versions.

Other than the encoding standard used, my two Dish boxes work almost identically. Search and other software features are pretty much the same and there’s no apparent difference in the user experience. That also makes me think it’s something on the back end. In any case, I cherish my illegal DVRs, and you can have them when you pry them from … well, you know.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress