<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link targeting, the &#8220;rules&#8221;, and the experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/</link>
	<description>All The Wisdom That Fits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:19:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Even a more egregious violation in my mind is javascript links that DON&#039;T open up in a new window.  Then when you do try to open them in a new window they come up invalid.  

I don&#039;t mind sites that add the open in new window command to links.  I can always close the extra windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a more egregious violation in my mind is javascript links that DON&#8217;T open up in a new window.  Then when you do try to open them in a new window they come up invalid.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind sites that add the open in new window command to links.  I can always close the extra windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul - Thanks for the response. It might have been more accurate for me to say that in practice now the Snap Shots are annoying and rather useless. The annoying part is that they are triggered by a rollover, which isn&#039;t necessarily intent to launch them, and the rather useless part comes in the prevalence of web site previews being the content. 

But you&#039;re right that some of the functionality is well-suited for that kind of flow I&#039;m talking about. The map display is a good example, because you can get good context within the preview window. Same deal with a stock chart. 

My impression right now as a user, though, is that Snap Shots are clutter and don&#039;t offer value. And that&#039;s based on previous experience where they show up when I&#039;m not trying to invoke them and they haven&#039;t offered value because they tend to be the web site preview. So that negative impression leads me to avoid triggering them; it doesn&#039;t call me to see what&#039;s underneath. 

TechCrunch no doubt is an early user, though, and I&#039;m probably an early adopter. As you iterate, I&#039;m sure you&#039;re focusing on making the triggers more explicit and the content more valuable so the mass-market sites and users don&#039;t get soured by missed expectations. 

I&#039;ll check out the suite of shots you offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul &#8211; Thanks for the response. It might have been more accurate for me to say that in practice now the Snap Shots are annoying and rather useless. The annoying part is that they are triggered by a rollover, which isn&#8217;t necessarily intent to launch them, and the rather useless part comes in the prevalence of web site previews being the content. </p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right that some of the functionality is well-suited for that kind of flow I&#8217;m talking about. The map display is a good example, because you can get good context within the preview window. Same deal with a stock chart. </p>
<p>My impression right now as a user, though, is that Snap Shots are clutter and don&#8217;t offer value. And that&#8217;s based on previous experience where they show up when I&#8217;m not trying to invoke them and they haven&#8217;t offered value because they tend to be the web site preview. So that negative impression leads me to avoid triggering them; it doesn&#8217;t call me to see what&#8217;s underneath. </p>
<p>TechCrunch no doubt is an early user, though, and I&#8217;m probably an early adopter. As you iterate, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re focusing on making the triggers more explicit and the content more valuable so the mass-market sites and users don&#8217;t get soured by missed expectations. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll check out the suite of shots you offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Angles, Marketing Director, Snap.com</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Angles, Marketing Director, Snap.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Hey, Cap&#039;n Ken,

Just a quick note to ask you to  give Snap Shots another chance because we&#039;re far more than a simple preview.

The whole point of Snap Shots is very much in line with what you&#039;re discussing, but perhaps I can state it differently: the ideal user experience is to bring the information to them, on your site, and to send them away only as a last resort.

The simplest Snap  Shot is PreviewShot, the website preview function you see so frequently on TechCrunch, but there are 11 others which are huge functional upgrades.

*RSS Shot, for example, allows you to skim a blogroll and just read the current RSS feeds

*MapShot displays a Google map off a link

*StockShot shows a current stock chart

I encourage you to visit http://www.snap.com/hotshots to see how  we handle video, audio, Wikipedia, and even World of Warcraft.

Best,

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Cap&#8217;n Ken,</p>
<p>Just a quick note to ask you to  give Snap Shots another chance because we&#8217;re far more than a simple preview.</p>
<p>The whole point of Snap Shots is very much in line with what you&#8217;re discussing, but perhaps I can state it differently: the ideal user experience is to bring the information to them, on your site, and to send them away only as a last resort.</p>
<p>The simplest Snap  Shot is PreviewShot, the website preview function you see so frequently on TechCrunch, but there are 11 others which are huge functional upgrades.</p>
<p>*RSS Shot, for example, allows you to skim a blogroll and just read the current RSS feeds</p>
<p>*MapShot displays a Google map off a link</p>
<p>*StockShot shows a current stock chart</p>
<p>I encourage you to visit <a href="http://www.snap.com/hotshots" rel="nofollow">http://www.snap.com/hotshots</a> to see how  we handle video, audio, Wikipedia, and even World of Warcraft.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hey Strutton - welcome to the Wisdom.

Yeah, GoDaddy is really a pain in the ass like that. Like you, I&#039;ll be in trying to edit something, switch over to another non-GD window and then not know which GD window I needed to go back to. Frustrating, and apparently pointless. 

I think your approach at least has some logic to it. Users are either staying in &quot;your world&quot; and getting the same window or leaving it and getting a new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Strutton &#8211; welcome to the Wisdom.</p>
<p>Yeah, GoDaddy is really a pain in the ass like that. Like you, I&#8217;ll be in trying to edit something, switch over to another non-GD window and then not know which GD window I needed to go back to. Frustrating, and apparently pointless. </p>
<p>I think your approach at least has some logic to it. Users are either staying in &#8220;your world&#8221; and getting the same window or leaving it and getting a new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Strutton</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Strutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>A new window typically tells me the link I&#039;m following isn&#039;t directly connected or owned by the site. I for one, can&#039;t stand when a site uses new windows for their own content. GoDaddy is bad for this. I typically go there to adjust a setting and by the time I&#039;m done I can have as many as 4 windows open, all owned by GoDaddy. BTW, I pondered this with my new blog site, and for now, I&#039;m sticking to a simple rule, if it leads to a destination of mine (flickr, youtube, etc) same window, otherwise it gets a new window (maybe I&#039;m wrong).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new window typically tells me the link I&#8217;m following isn&#8217;t directly connected or owned by the site. I for one, can&#8217;t stand when a site uses new windows for their own content. GoDaddy is bad for this. I typically go there to adjust a setting and by the time I&#8217;m done I can have as many as 4 windows open, all owned by GoDaddy. BTW, I pondered this with my new blog site, and for now, I&#8217;m sticking to a simple rule, if it leads to a destination of mine (flickr, youtube, etc) same window, otherwise it gets a new window (maybe I&#8217;m wrong).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>As both of you have hinted at, a real-world question becomes what the &quot;typical user&quot; is going to expect and how that user is going to behave. Of course, I think the &quot;typical Internet user&quot; still goes to a web site by entering the site&#039;s name at Google ... so figuring out what is &quot;typical&quot; can be tough. 

Perhaps what we&#039;re talking about is link behavior in the Semantic Web sense. I tell you a link is &quot;reference&quot;, your browser has a default way of handling it and you as a user can customize the behavior. Less focus on what the link is supposed to do and more focus on what it&#039;s supposed to mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As both of you have hinted at, a real-world question becomes what the &#8220;typical user&#8221; is going to expect and how that user is going to behave. Of course, I think the &#8220;typical Internet user&#8221; still goes to a web site by entering the site&#8217;s name at Google &#8230; so figuring out what is &#8220;typical&#8221; can be tough. </p>
<p>Perhaps what we&#8217;re talking about is link behavior in the Semantic Web sense. I tell you a link is &#8220;reference&#8221;, your browser has a default way of handling it and you as a user can customize the behavior. Less focus on what the link is supposed to do and more focus on what it&#8217;s supposed to mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCL</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>TCL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Amen, brother.  Not being a techie, or caring too much about the conventional wisdom on the rules of the Internet, I didn&#039;t realize that it was looked down upon to have your link open in a new window -- I just knew that it sure as hell makes a lot more sense to me, as a user of the damn thing, to be able to read the referenced content, then close that window or tab, rather than having to use the back button.  Many have been the times that I have read what&#039;s in the referenced content and wanted to dig deeper into that before jumping back to the main/initial article.  That causes a whole chain of &quot;back button&quot; uses to get back to Point A.  And TYB is right, even a conventional user such as me has developed the habit of right clicking and selecting Open in New Window, but I sometimes forget.  And why should I have to remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, brother.  Not being a techie, or caring too much about the conventional wisdom on the rules of the Internet, I didn&#8217;t realize that it was looked down upon to have your link open in a new window &#8212; I just knew that it sure as hell makes a lot more sense to me, as a user of the damn thing, to be able to read the referenced content, then close that window or tab, rather than having to use the back button.  Many have been the times that I have read what&#8217;s in the referenced content and wanted to dig deeper into that before jumping back to the main/initial article.  That causes a whole chain of &#8220;back button&#8221; uses to get back to Point A.  And TYB is right, even a conventional user such as me has developed the habit of right clicking and selecting Open in New Window, but I sometimes forget.  And why should I have to remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Yellow Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>That Yellow Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capnken.com/wisdom/2008/04/26/link-targeting-the-rules-and-the-experience/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I, for one, think it would be cool if a new target result could be &quot;background&quot; or &quot;tab,&quot; (although, if you have Firefox properly configured, it will open target=&quot;new&quot; links in a new tab).  

I think that for someone who&#039;s savvy enough to be configuring Wordpress on their own server, middle-clicking a link to automatically open it in a new window is pretty much second-nature.  Indeed, one might also say as much for the average reader of a Wordpress blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, think it would be cool if a new target result could be &#8220;background&#8221; or &#8220;tab,&#8221; (although, if you have Firefox properly configured, it will open target=&#8221;new&#8221; links in a new tab).  </p>
<p>I think that for someone who&#8217;s savvy enough to be configuring Wordpress on their own server, middle-clicking a link to automatically open it in a new window is pretty much second-nature.  Indeed, one might also say as much for the average reader of a Wordpress blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
